September 28, 2021 by MMinspect
That is where the devil will be in the details, and so I would like to ask your firm to look at the terms of the framework contract, in addition to how the contracts were transferred from one entity to another. By updating, I meant that adding or admitting new suppliers to the already existing list of tested suppliers, you call it a dynamic framework. Under the indication that this was not mentioned in the original product specification or in the document used for excise duties. Hello, I wonder if you could help with some information here, our company got the first rank supplier on a frame, I am informed that this is not a “contract” that is only in effect if an order is placed and accepted, although the authority of these different variants / i.e. m2 surface areas and if outside opening hours etc. the items sometimes mean that our price is not the cheapest in the lot put up for auction, where we rank the number 1, it should also be noted that the evaluation carried out evaluated only certain sets of tapes, completely omitting the sentences entered for some banding, and the local authority therefore came to the ranking, our prices based on the method of evaluation and on the What is economically profitable for our company, can you indicate if this is something that the local authority can do, since it has awarded work to suppliers both outside the framework and at more advantageous prices than those provided for in our call for tenders, despite a clause stipulating that the tenders must remain “firm” for the first 12 months. Where it becomes difficult is when an organization tries to set up a framework that could be used by a very large number of organizations, for example: OGC Buying Solutions, or as we must call it now, the Government Procurement Service. These are almost always established without consulting potential elements, so any estimate of the volume of the contract, etc., is highly suspicious. There is also no real transparency, accountability or accountability in these agreements and, on the whole, I think they do not work very well.
Is that fair? The second bidder has not formally received the cover letter and therefore cannot participate in the framework. A framework contract is not a contract in itself, it only sets out the conditions applicable to a contract concluded in the context of an appeal. . . .
